Conservative The conservative and progressive-liberal people are different in

Conservative
versus Liberal bias

The
issue of media bias has been at the center stage of public talks for a long
time now.  It is a custom in which media
in one way or another gives out stories which are one-sided or in a prejudiced
manner. Different people have different perceptions and views on a specific
source of media as well as the stories broadcasted.  The conservative and progressive-liberal
people are different in their values towards media biases. They have different
perception towards shows, TV stations, newspaper, and movies. These have made
many people differ and everyone to value media that they feel it’s good for
them since it favors their side.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Some
people feel some media stations take a conservative
approach (Conservative) while other individuals feel
some of the media stations take a liberal approach (Liberal). Fox news, in
particular, has been noted to exhibit notoriety in having a right-wing
inclination (Gonzales, Manuel, and Richard 48). Many times Fox news is seen as
being pro-republicans. On the other hand, the other mainstream media led by
channels such as CNN, MSNBC among others have been observed to exhibit a liberal inclination in the content they avail
to their viewers (Gonzales et al., 48). The conservatives are often known to be
orthodox, pure traditionalists and individuals who are averse to change or new
ideas. The try to narrow and try to propagate specific
scenarios over the media (Beckstein 18). On the other hand, the liberals are
widely known to be accommodative to new ideas. They are open-minded people and
give a comprehensive view and try to take
all rounded information of the stories as they air out in the media. They show
respect to other people’s ideas, which may be different from their own. The
above applies to media stations exhibiting either conservative or liberal bias.

In
the run-up to the 2012 elections it, the Democrat’s candidate, and then Obama
received negative publicity from Fox media outlets. Democrats are often assumed
to be liberals. It is worth noting during the campaigns, 49% of the publicity that President Obama then received
focused on his shortcomings (Gonzales et al., 48). Evidently, Fox Media news
was taking a skewed approach. In 2011, an affiliate of Fox news made a typo
reporting that Obama bin Laden was dead. The typo drew much outrage from a
majority of netizens on Twitter. Also in the run-up to the 2016 presidential
nominations, Fox news exhibited similar bias against Bernie Sanders (Beckstein
18).

In
reporting about the results from presidential nominations race, the media
outlet said that Bernie Sanders stood no chance since Hillary had twice the
number of votes.  On the other despite
Trump having almost twice the number of votes as Cruz, the media outlet never
ruled him out. On the other hand, CNN and MSNBC news outlet advanced more of an
anti-trump agenda during the last presidential elections (Gonzales et al., 48).
Apparently, they were seen to protect Hillary Clinton at all costs. In more
than one incident, the station was observed to cut down guests who were
anti-Hillary. It is also worth noting that it is these two media outlets that
brought forth the news about the Russia probe. This
must have intentions towards tainting the image of Trump. Lastly, more than 96%
of the media personality donations went to Hillary Clinton (Gonzales et al.,
48). Few of the media personalities either donated or vouched for Trump. In
some instances, some of the media personalities blatantly admitted on live
televisions that they were endorsing Hillary.

Examples
of Media bias

Fox
News cut Ron Paul immediately when he attempted to show how the media was
biased. Ron was commenting on the issue of why his name was not given
significant attention in most of the media outlets despite him amassing a
considerable number of followers. He, in particular, lamented how his name was
read once compared to the other candidate’s names, which was read more than five times (Beckstein 8).
While trying to expound on the issue, he was cut
off immediately. The partiality in broadcasting has made the media to be biased
in the way and making it perpetrate other problems in society.

In
the year 2004, media bias occurs in the incident of death of Michael Brown and
Dillon Taylor in which it occurs within two days. In the comparison of the two
cases, news about the death of Michael Brown in which white policeman killed
him spread out all over the media. After two days only another young man by the
name Dillion Taylor was shot by a white policeman by the news didn’t spread
like the news of Michael Brown. As a result,
the issue of racism penetrated into media bias. In another incident captured by
MSNBC showed that the media outlet cut a black person who identified himself as
a Trump supporter. The station had a predefined school of thought that all
blacks should be Democrats, and thus that is why the presenter’s maybe cut him
off. It is noted that the media give much
attention and exaggerate the stories relating to racism. The news over present the stories of Africa
American to perpetuate that there is injustice down to black people by white
people. The media want to show that the black are victims of crime committed by
the white people and to disclose racism is the story of the day. The way the
news is being spread out tell more about
the issue of media biased and result to issue of racism. This also has
been propagated by the issue of
conservatives and liberal people who judge a story according to their
perception thus biasing it.

Based
on a recent poll conducted by Gallup it showed that public confidence in the
media had sunk to worrying levels. Only 32 percent of individuals trust the
media outlets (Gonzales et al., 48). This
means only three out of ten people have trust in the national news outlet. The
main reason behind this worrying numbers is perhaps the lack of objectivity and
fairness on the part of the media which in turn propagate the media bias.

In
another recent research on  ”Trump
administration seen as truthful than news media” done by political
communication professor Spencer Kimball, the polls show that 49% of people show
that trump administration to be truthful while 48% find him to be untruthful.
The researcher also extended his research and compare the confidence rating of
news media and found that 53% of people say that news media are untruth
(Leandra 6). The finds out that people have confidence in trump news that the
news media. This reveals that due to
media biases the confidence of believing
in news media has gone done and the people can believe
more on the news from another source in the long run.

In
the above poll result about the media in the recent, it shows that the level of
public confidence is lowering due to biases of media. The declining rate of
public trust is an alarming rate. This
has made the public to think otherwise rather than to believe on what is broadcasted in the media. The level of media
biases is so increasing that drastically reduce confidence levels of the
public. They should remain unbiased and spread what truth is and avoid being
partial. A point of concern should be taken into consideration to avoid losing
public confidence in the media since it may render it meaningless.

 

x

Hi!
I'm Clifton!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out