Introduction upon the belief that nothing is so sacred

Introduction

 

           Since
the 1600s, Capital punishment has been one of the most controversial issues in
America has increased immensely over the years  (Keyer, 2007). My hypothesis is “Does
capital punishment deter murder?”.  There
are numerous issues where capital punishment is concerned. Some of these are
mental state, juveniles, race, gender, etc.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

            Bye (1919) describes his theory of
deterrence about the death penalty: “This theory rests upon the belief that
nothing is so sacred to an individual as his life. The prospect of impending
death is a threat too ominous to be ignored. While one might be willing to run
the risk of a lesser penalty for the sake of achieving his objective, he would
not be willing to risk anything so highly cherished as life itself. The death
penalty, therefore, is upheld as the most powerful of all deterrents and a
potent aid in the repression of crime” (Bye, 1892-reprint 1919, p. 31). Could
it be a factor for the person potentially committing murder to think that the
justice system will ultimately not execute them even if they received the
punishment of the death penalty due to appeals and stays of execution? 

            This research will focus on whether the death
penalty deters persons from committing murder. The importance of this study is determining if states that
impose the death penalty have significantly less murder than those who don’t
and to determine what factors may help or hinder the accuracy of the research.

Literature Review

The
first published research on the whether the death penalty deters crime was by
Edwin Sutherland in 1925.  Edwin
Sutherland was one of the most important and well-known criminologists in the
world. Since then there has been a long line of criminologists, other scholars,
and scientists that have been interested in the question of whether Capital
punishment is a deterrent to murder rather than life- imprisonment. Most of the
research shows that the death penalty does not deter criminals from committing
murder. The claim has commonly been that there are no conclusive results from
studies that show that the death penalty deters murder.  In recent years, there have been more studies
that show that it may deter people from committing murder.

 In Edwin Sutherland’s 1925 Study, he believed
the death penalty was not more effective than life in prison. His study showed
the death penalty had no effect on whether people commit murder.

Science
does truly make an inference. It did. There is no doubt,” said Naci Mocan,
a financial aspects teacher at the University of Colorado at Denver. “The
determination is there is an obstacle impact.”

A
recent report he co-created, and a recent report that rethought the
information, found that every execution brings about five fewer manslaughters,
and driving a capital punishment implies five more murders. “The outcomes
are hearty, they don’t generally leave,” he said. “I contradict
capital punishment. In any case, my outcomes demonstrate that capital
punishment (prevents) _ what am I going to do, shroud them?” Naci Mocan
said in the finish of 2066 examination that reconsidered the 2003 investigation
directed beforehand.

To
investigate the inquiry, they take a gander at executions and murders, by year
and by state or area, attempting to coax out the effect of capital punishment
on manslaughters by representing different elements, for example, joblessness
information and per capita wage, the probabilities of capture and conviction,
and that’s only the tip of the iceberg. (Leather expert, 2007)

Measurable
examinations like his are among twelve papers since 2001 that death penalty has
obstruction impacts. The Illinois restriction on executions in 2000 incited 150
additional murders over four years following, as demonstrated by a current
report by instructors at the University of Houston. (Alfano, 2007) Accelerating
executions would fortify the obstruction impact. For like clockwork cut from
time spent waiting for capital punishment, one murder would be anticipated, as
indicated by a recent report by an Emory University educator. In 2005, there were 16,692 examples of murder and
nonnegligent crime comprehensively. There were 60 executions. (Fox News, 2007)

The
examinations’ choices made a philosophical response from a remarkable liberal
law instructor, University of Chicago’s Cass Sunstein. A faultfinder of capital
punishment.

“On
the off chance that the case executing killers keeps the execution of innocents
by killers, at that point, the ethical assessment isn’t basic,” he
revealed to The Associated Press. “Abolitionists or others, similar to me,
who are incredulous about capital punishment haven’t given sufficient thought
to the likelihood that pure life is spared by capital punishment,”
Sunstein said that ethical inquiries aside, the information needs more
investigation. Faultfinders of the discoveries have been vociferous. Some claim
that the genius obstacle examines committed significant errors in their system,
so their outcomes are dishonest.

NASA’s
National Research Council concluded from their study on Deterrence and the
Death Penalty there was Research considering links between capital punishment
and murder rates is “fundamentally flawed,” concludes a National
Research Council panel led by criminologist Daniel Nagin of Carnegie-Mellon
University in Pittsburgh. (National Research Council Deterrence and the Death
Penalty, April 2012)

According
to a study published today in Northwestern University School of Law’s Journal
of Criminal Law and Criminology authored by Professor Michael Radelet, chair of
the sociology department at the University of Colorado at Boulder, and Traci
Lacock, an attorney and CU-Boulder graduate student in sociology.  The study was conducted by sending questionnaires
to the most pre-eminent criminologists in the country, including fellows of the
American Society of Criminology, winners of the American Society of
Criminology’s prestigious Southerland Award and recent presidents of the
American Society of Criminology. The agreement among criminologists is that
capital punishment does not include any critical obstruction impact over that
of long-haul detainment. Eighty-eight percent of the country’s top
criminologists do not believe the death penalty acts as a deterrent to
homicide. How noteworthy is capital punishment impediment impact when those
waiting for capital punishment can make the most of their lives for no less
than 10 years before they are executed?

Journal
of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 99 Issue 2 Winter Article 4 Winter 2009
Do Executions Lower Homicide Rates: The Views of Leading Criminologists ‘
Michael L. Radelet Traci L. Lacock. The exploration revealed in this Article
was a refresh the 1996 investigation and check whether any new discouragement
ponders have changed the convictions of any of the world’s driving
criminologists. The results show that only an about 10% at most of the top
criminologists believes research studies support the deterrence of murder by
implementing the death penalty. The percentage differs per the way the questions
were asked.  

In
2002, research by econometrician Naci Mocan found that every execution prompted
5-8 less murders, and for each three extra ” pardons ” of a death row
prisoner, there were 1-1. 5 more murders. Later Emory University financial
analyst Paul H. Rubin and his partners started to expose their work which found
that every execution hindered around eighteen homicides. “The conclusion
is there is a deterrent effect.”(Tanner, 2007)

In
2007, Professors Roy Adler and Michael, Professors at Pepperdine University
distributed a commentary in the Wall Street Journal guaranteeing that their
information demonstrated every execution in the United States, from 1979-2004,
kept some seventy-four murders in the next year. (The Journal of Criminal Law
& Criminology Vol. 99, No. 2)

The
board reasons that examination to date isn’t educational about whether the
death penalty declines, increments, or has no impact on crime rates. Hence,
these investigations ought not to be utilized to educate considerations
requiring judgments about the impact of capital punishment on murder. Cases
that examination exhibits that death penalty reduces or expands the
manslaughter rate or has no impact on it ought not to impact strategy judgments
about the death penalty. (Report Brief, April 2012).

A
group of scientists reviewed research conducted since 1977 and found there
wasn’t enough data to support whether the death penalty decreases, increases,
or has no effect on murder.

Methods

This
study is designed to address questions concerning states having the death penalty
deters crime and other factors that may affect the results. The death penalty
may have different results for different states due to the stay of execution or
long incarcerations prior to being executed.

One
research study will be of each state with and without the death penalty and if
the murder rate is lower in the states with the death penalty by researching
studies done previously. In each state with the death penalty another study will
be the length of time prisoners on death row are incarcerated prior to execution
and how long they have been on death row indefinitely, received a stay, or a reversal
to life in prison. This study will be a combination of researching studies done
and creating individual studies from a study of a random selection of states
with the death penalty. Another study will be a survey study, asking a random
sample of men, if it would deter them from committing murder in states with the
death penalty and would it deter them if the time on death row have a shorter,
more definite time to be executed. Also, a survey of a random sample of male prisoners
at different prisons who committed capital, aggravated, first, or second-degree
murder in states without the death penalty will be asked as to whether they would
have committed murder or if they would do it again if the death penalty had or will
be implemented in their state. These studies will need to be done consecutively
and all completed for more of an accurate result to be possible. 

x

Hi!
I'm Clifton!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out