During the period of British colonial rule over Palestine (1917–1948), a series of major contracts were awarded to Zionist enterprises. These contracts constituted a central component of the Zionist project, allowing it to gain control of Palestine’s most lucrative natural resources, industrial production, and the provision of essential services—a decisive factor in the Zionist Movement ’s conquest of Palestine in 1948. Far from a neutral arbiter, the British regime began its rule over Palestine with a clear plan to award such contracts to Zionist enterprise as part of its wider approach to “colonial development.”
From Moses Hess
to Theodor Herzl
, early Zionist thought is saturated with visions of Jewish industry and exploitation of natural resources. As British policy makers contemplated the imperial conquest of Palestine during World War I
, this strand of Zionist thought presented itself as the perfect ally for realizing
Zionism as an Agent of British Imperialism
Embedded in Britain’s approach to colonial development in Palestine was a well-established racialized hierarchy that saw Jews as industrious and productive “middlemen” of empire, while Arabs were viewed with patronizing disdain as “backward” and “traditional.” As Winston Churchill
affirmed when defending the decision to award a major electricity contract in Palestine to a Jewish enterprise in 1921: “The Arabs of Palestine would not in a thousand years have taken effective steps towards the irrigation and electrification of Palestine.” This racially based preference for Jewish enterprise in Palestine eventually made its way into the terms of the British Mandate itself, ratified by the League of Nations
in July 1922. Article 11 stipulated: “The [British] Administration may arrange with the
As the British Mandate got underway, a spate of development contracts was farmed out to Zionist enterprises, allowing Britain to focus its colonial expenditure on security, infrastructure, and policing. Colonial officials posted to Palestine often remarked on the unjust nature of the arrangement, reporting to superiors in London
that British policy was stirring increasing unrest among the Arab Palestinian population. Policy makers in London, however, remained wedded to the idea that European Jews were best suited to serve as Britain’s agents of development on the ground. As a new network of British imperial infrastructure was built across the
Haifa as the Nexus of Colonial Development
Early in the British Mandate, the coastal city of
As Haifa expanded in the 1920s and 1930s, Jewish entrepreneurs worked in close consultation with British government planners. Zionist developers saw the value of their assets rise considerably when the government authorized the construction of the new oil refinery site in the
Elsewhere in the city, Jewish industries like the Nesher cement factory
were indispensable to the execution of Britain’s imperialist projects. Founded in
All elements of Haifa’s industrial complex were dependent on the production of electricity. To this end, the
Rutenberg’s monopoly over electricity production in Palestine was the subject of vociferous complaints by Arab Palestinians, all of which were dismissed outright by the British government on the grounds that only European Jews could drive forward the country’s modernization. In Haifa, Rutenberg’s Palestine Electric Company was present at every stage of the planning and construction of the harbor and surrounding development, supplying the power for all works carried out during the 1920s and 1930s. By 1934 Rutenberg had established a much larger plant, known as Haifa A , in the northeast of the Bay Area, built by the Solel Boneh construction company using Nesher cement. Towering above the city’s industrial zone with its red and white striped towers, this vast structure stands today as an administrative center of Palestine Electric Company’s successor company, the Israel Electric Corporation —a testament to Zionism’s enduring partnership with British imperialism.
The Dead Sea Development
A vital component of the British-Zionist drive to exploit Palestine’s natural resources was the Dead Sea
. Having long eyed the area as a potential source of industrial minerals, the Colonial Office once again decided to farm out its development plans to a Zionist enterprise, this time awarding a concession to another Russian-Jewish entrepreneur, Moshe Novomeysky
. In 1931, Novomeysky’s
From the beginning, the Dead Sea concession was widely opposed by Arab Palestinians. In the 1920s and 1930s, sovereignty over natural resources was a key part of Arab national demands in Palestine and elsewhere in the Middle East. As seen in the front-page cartoon of the newspaper
Despite a barrage of international and local protests over the Dead Sea concession, Britain ploughed ahead with Novomeysky’s project. Several alternative schemes were put forward by Arab-led enterprises, all to be rejected by the British colonial regime. These included local Palestinian businessmen,
The value of Zionist enterprise to British imperial interests was quickly realised during World War II when Novomeysky’s Palestine Potash Ltd became a major supplier of essential raw materials for Britain’s wartime effort. Constituting Britain’s largest supplier of both potash and bromine, Palestine now ranked fifth in the overall list of chemical exporters to Britain, thanks to the Dead Sea. Meanwhile, Haifa stood as Britain’s largest naval base in the eastern Mediterranean, the center of its Middle Eastern rail network and the coastal outlet for Iraqi oil. Often overlooked in histories of political conflict, Zionism had to a large degree repaid Britain’s early faith, building a web of colonial development that protected British interests while marginalising the indigenous Palestinian population.
At the political level, the British-Zionist partnership had broken down by the end of World War II, with Britain eventually relinquishing its Mandate over Palestine in May 1948. But the economic alliance between Zionism and the British Empire would prove an enduring asset to the newly formed state of Israel. During the war of 1948–49, Zionist control over Palestine’s key natural assets, as well as its essential infrastructure, was a crucial factor in the defeat of the Palestinian resistance. It was not by chance that Zionist forces were so heavily concentrated in Haifa, allowing Israel access to the city’s oil refineries, Palestine’s biggest harbor, and the central hub of the country’s rail network. The Dead Sea development, meanwhile, lay in ruins by the end of the war, but it was not long before Israel re-established Palestine Potash as the Dead Sea Works at the southern end of the Dead Sea, forming a vital source of raw materials for the Zionist state’s military–industrial complex. What had started as an alliance between British imperialism and the nascent Zionist movement had now provided the economic foundations for Israel’s ongoing colonization of Palestinian lands.
Meiton, Fredrik. “Nation or Industry: The Non-Electrification of Nablus.” Jerusalem Quarterly 80 (Winter 2019): 8–22.
Norris, Jacob. Land of Progress: Palestine in the Age of Colonial Development, 1905–1948. London: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Seikaly, Sherene. Men of Capital: Scarcity and Economy in Mandate Palestine. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2015.
Wolfe, Patrick. “Purchase by Other Means: The Palestine Nakba and Zionism’s Conquest of Economics.” Settler Colonial Studies 2, no.1 (2012): 133–71.
Related Content
Illustration
Caricature: Balfour and the Woes His Ill-Fated Promise Brought to Palestine (Filastin Newspaper)
2 November 1932